In this final article of my three
part series on oxygen dynamics in reef aquaria, I will:
-
Present data gained by measuring the function and long-term
results of established aquaria of various sizes and configurations.
-
Show the short-term effects on those same systems of
various devices or manipulations.
-
Include data on the oxygen dynamics of shipping bags
and numerous other systems measured at different locations
and times.
-
Discuss the various components that are the principle
players in oxygen dynamics and their relative importance
in terms of the "average" reef aquarium.
Together with the previous installments of the series, I
have begun to understand some of the average oxygen values
in various containers of seawater and the dynamics of the
oxygen state in closed systems. My goal is that individual
aquarists can use this data set to analyze their own systems
by comparison and make any appropriate or needed alterations
to ensure the health of their captive systems, or their shipping
practices, through maintaining adequate water oxygen levels.
Methods
The methods for this experiment are
similar to those presented in my previous article on the subject
(Borneman 2005a,b). When monitoring reef aquariums, the oxygen
probe was positioned in the same place for each measurement,
with the requirement that water flowing past the probe met
the minimum level required to obtain accurate readings. Prior
to removing the probe, another reading was taken by manually
moving the probe back and forth in the water to ensure that
readings were consistent.
Tanks Utilized
Tank 1: "Clownfish Tank"
Size: standard 10-gallon
glass aquarium
Water flow: two Aquaclear
201 powerheads (Rolf C. Hagen, Inc.)
Lighting: two 65-watt
power compacts (one blue, one white)
Substrates: 6 cm aragonite
sand, approximately 15 pounds of live rock
Major animals present:
five Trochus snails, ten Nassarius snails,
two juvenile Amphiprion percula, one Entacmaea
quadricolor
Corals: Isaurus
sp., Protopalythoa sp., Psammacora sp., Tubastraea
sp., Zoanthus sp., Pavona sp., Pocillopora
sp., Acropora sp.
Filtration: none (test
1); CPR BakPak skimmer (CPR Aquatic, Inc.) (test 2)
Tank 2: "Puffer Tank"
Size: standard 75-gallon
glass aquarium
Water flow: two Maxi-Jet
1200 powerheads (Aquarium Systems, Inc.)
Lighting: two 55-watt
power compacts (one blue, one white) (CurrentUSA)
Substrates: 8 cm aragonite
sand, approximately 80 pounds of live rock
Major animals present:
one Diodon holocanthus, one Salarias fasciatus,
one Ctenochaetus strigosus, one Entacmaea quadricolor
Corals: Psuedopterogorgia
sp., Scolymia sp., Protopalythoa sp., Zoanthus
sp., Anthelia sp., Isaurus sp., Capnella
sp.
Filtration: CPR BakPak
skimmer (CPR Aquatic, Inc.)(test 1); ATS unit (Inland Aquatics)
and Remora HOB skimmer (Aqua C, Inc.)(test 2)
Tank 3: "Main Reef Tank"
Size: multi-tank system,
approximately 600 gallons total
Water flow: two 6060
and two 6000 Turbelle Stream pumps (Tunze USA), two
Rio Seio M1-1500 pumps (TAAM, Inc.), 40-gallon surge
tank fed by Ampmaster 2100 (Dolphin Aquarium and Pet Products,
Inc.)
Lighting: day cycle:
one 1000-watt metal halide, two 400-watt metal halides (Sunlight
Supply, Inc.); night cycle: one 250-watt metal halide
(Sunlight Supply, Inc.), two 65-watt power compacts (white)
(Lights of America, Inc.), three 1-watt LED's (blue)
Substrates: 5-15 cm
aragonite sand, approximately 300-400 pounds live rock,
live rock rubble
Major animals present:
500 snails (Turbo sp., Trochus sp.,), 26 fish,
three Entacmaea quadricolor, Aiptasia spp.,
two tridacnid clams
Corals: Over 80 species
and several hundred colonies
Filtration: MR-2 Beckett
injection skimmer (My Reef Creations), activated carbon
filter (Ocean Clear 320), ozone generator (OZX-B300T, Enaly
Trade Co., Ltd.)
Tank 3: "Culture Tanks"
Size: multi-tank system,
approximately 500 gallons total
Water flow: divided
flow from Ampmaster 2600 (Dolphin Aquarium and Pet
Products, Inc.) with eductors (KTH Sales, Inc.), two 6060
Turbelle Stream pumps (Tunze USA), two Rio Seio M11500
pumps (TAAM, Inc.), passive flow
Lighting: differing
for each tank: four 65-watt T5 fluorescents, four 65-watt
power compacts (white and blue; white), three 175-watt metal
halides, two 400-watt metal halides, one 1000-watt metal
halide
Substrates: remotely
located live rock (250 pounds), live rock rubble, some tanks
have fine grained aragonite sand
Major animals present:
900 snails (Trochus sp., Astrea sp., Nassarius
sp., Cerith sp.); one Zebrasoma flavescens,
one Ctenochaetus strigosus)
Corals: 30 species,
several hundred colonies
Filtration: MR-2 Beckett
injection skimmer (My Reef Creations), passive activated
carbon filter, ozone generator (OZX-B300T, Enaly Trade Co.,
Ltd.)
Other Measurements
Several shipping bags also were used to determine oxygen
levels present in bag water. These included standard plastic
coral shipping bags and "breathable" bags (Evert-Fresh
Corp.). Sterile seawater, untreated tank water and tank water
containing a coral were measured by packing them with an atmospheric
air "cap." The bags were placed inside a thin plastic
dish to support them in an upright position while measurements
were taken. The oxygen probe was placed inside the bag along
with a Teflon stir bar and the bag was tightly sealed using
parafilm and tape to prevent air exchange. The entire dish,
bag and probe were then placed onto a magnetic stir plate
to create enough water motion to record oxygen levels.
A variety of other point-readings and measurements were taken
on other tanks. These are presented as indications of potential
variation between tanks and to provide information about the
specific effects of organisms or conditions on oxygen levels
in seawater containers. Most of these readings were taken
from display tanks at retail stores, display tanks at the
IMAC 2005 conference in Chicago and from shipping bags. Other
readings were recorded at a local coral wholesale facility,
a ten-gallon tank with aged seawater and 27g (a large handful)
of Chaetomorpha sp. algae, and a fifteen-gallon tank
containing only a piece of live rock.
Results
Tank 1 (Clownfish Tank)
Figure 1 shows the oxygen dynamics of Tank 1 in operation
without a skimmer. Figure 2 shows the oxygen dynamics of Tank
2 with a skimmer in operation.
Figure 1. Oxygen levels in Tank 1 without a skimmer
in operation. Arrows indicate notable factors that changed
oxygen levels. Gaps in data indicate times when measurements
were not taken.
|
Figure 2. Oxygen levels of Tank 1 with a skimmer
in operation. Arrows indicate notable factors that changed
oxygen levels. Gaps in data indicate times when measurements
were not taken.
|
Tank 2 (Puffer Tank)
Figure 3 shows the oxygen dynamics of Tank 2 in operation
without a reverse daylight algal turf scrubber. Figure 4 shows
the oxygen dynamics of Tank 2 with an algal turf scrubber
in operation.
Figure 3. Oxygen levels in Tank 2 with a skimmer
but no algal turf scrubber in operation. Arrows indicate
notable factors that changed oxygen levels. Gaps in
data indicate times when measurements were not taken.
|
Figure 4. Oxygen levels in Tank 2 with a skimmer
and an algal turf scrubber in operation. Arrows indicate
notable factors that changed oxygen levels. Gaps in
data indicate times when measurements were not taken.
|
Tanks 1 and 2: Airstone Use at Night
Because of the pronounced increase in oxygen caused by using
an airstone in a hypoxic 10-gallon coral-only tank (Borneman
2005b), I decided to determine what effect the addition of
an airstone powered by a Rena 400 air pump (Aquarium
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) would have on Tanks 1 and 2 at night.
Figure 5 displays the results of that test. In Tank 1, the
airstone was used for only 30 minutes. It was then moved to
Tank 2 where it remained all night until 0800 the following
morning.
Figure 5. Oxygen levels in Tanks 1 and 2 beginning
at lights out and using an airstone. Note the scaling
of time between the last two readings. The green line
represents Tank 1 and the purple line represents Tank
2.
|
Tank 3 (Main Reef Tank)
Figures 6 and 7 show the oxygen dynamics of Tank 3 in operation
on two different days, several months apart.
Figure 6. Oxygen levels in Tank 3. Arrows indicate
notable factors in producing changes in oxygen levels.
Gaps in data indicate times when measurements were not
taken.
|
Figure 7. Oxygen levels in Tank 3. Arrows indicate
notable factors that changed oxygen levels. Gaps in
data indicate times when measurements were not taken.
|
Tank 4 (Culture Tank)
Figures 8 and 9 show the oxygen dynamics of Tank 4 in operation
on two different days, several months apart.
Figure 8. Oxygen levels in Tank 4. Arrows indicate
notable factors that changed in oxygen levels.
|
Figure 9. Oxygen levels in Tank 3. Arrows indicate
notable factors that changed in oxygen levels. Gaps
in data indicate times when measurements were not taken.
|
Other Measurements
I filled a narrow 15-gallon tank with sterile seawater and
sealed its top. After two days, I added a single piece of
live rock (approximately 5 pounds) to the tank; the top was
again sealed, and the tank was left unstirred and isolated
from light using black paper for three days. After that time,
I opened the top of the tank, waited several hours and then
turned on a powerhead (Maxijet 1200, Aquarium Systems
Inc.), waited several more hours and then placed a single
18" 15-watt fluorescent bulb above the tank. Several
hours later, I removed the rock, and turned off the light
and powerhead. The water became cloudy after about four hours,
and I continued to monitor oxygen levels over the next day.
The results are shown in Figure 10. Each of the respective
periods with a scaled x-axis (time) is shown in Figures 11-13.
Figure 10. Cumulative effects over several days
of a single piece of live rock (approximately 5 pounds)
on a fifteen-gallon tank. Because the x-axis is not
to scale, I have provided scaled figures (Figures 10-13)
to show the major events affecting oxygen levels over
the entire time period.
|
Figure 11. This graph shows the oxygen levels
in a fifteen-gallon tank filled with sterile seawater
and with the top sealed. No water flow was provided
and the tank was covered with black paper. Live rock
was added two days after filling with sterile seawater;
the tank was resealed, recovered with black paper, and
no circulation was provided.
|
Figure 12. This graph shows the oxygen levels
in a fifteen-gallon tank.
|
Figure 13. This graph shows the oxygen level
in a fifteen-gallon tank after the live rock was removed.
Within four hours, a slight haziness was visible in
the water, and by 18 hours, it was quite cloudy. At
26 hours, the oxygen readings were discontinued.
|
Chaetomorpha
A large handful of Chaetomorpha sp. algae was shaken
dry and weighed at 27g. The algae clump was placed into a
ten-gallon tank illuminated with a white 65-watt power compact
bulb (Lights of America, Inc.). The tank also had a Maxijet
1200 powerhead (Aquarium Systems, Inc.) which was turned
on at the beginning of the test, and off after several hours.
The results are shown in Figure 14.
Figure 14. Oxygen levels in a ten-gallon tank
with aged seawater and the addition of Chaetomorpha
sp. algae with and without light and water flow. Note
the scaling between the last two readings.
|
Shipping Bags
Readings for breathable and standard plastic bags are shown
in Figures 15 -17. In Figure 17, a medium sized Porites
cylindrica colony was placed into one liter of tank water
from Tank 3 and the bag was sealed around the probe. Point
rates for several bagged livestock orders were tested, as
well, and are shown in Table 1.
Figure 15. Oxygen content of nonsterile water
from Tank 3 placed into a gas permeable "breathable"
bag.
|
Figure 16. Oxygen content of nonsterile water
poured from breathable bag (Figure 14) into a standard
plastic shipping bag.
|
Figure 17. Oxygen content of nonsterile water
with air and a coral in a breathable bag.
|
Contents
of bag |
Gas
in bag
|
location
where measured
|
duration
in bag
|
oxygen
(% saturation)
|
Favia
sp. |
Oxygen
|
IMAC
|
18
hours
|
160.1
|
10
Trochus sp. |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
20
hours
|
133.0
|
10
Trochus sp. |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
20
hours
|
126.5
|
10
Trochus sp. |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
20
hours
|
147.5
|
10
“black footed” snails |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
20
hours
|
190.0
|
10
“black footed” snails |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
20
hours
|
142.5
|
10
“black footed” snails |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
20
hours
|
162.5
|
Acropora
sp. |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
36
hours
|
12.7
|
Acropora
sp. – cloudy, dead in bag |
Oxygen
|
Home
|
36
hours
|
2.2
|
Pocillopora
verrucossa |
Air
|
Home
|
2
hours
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
6
hours
|
88.6
|
Bag
water from above after coral removed |
|
|
14
hours
|
48.3
|
25
Trochus sp. |
Air
|
Home
|
14
hours
|
8.4
|
Table 1. Oxygen readings from various shipments
of livestock packed in standard plastic shipping bags
under either oxygen or air.
|
Effect of Stirring and an Airstone on Normoxic Seawater
To test the effects of stirring and an airstone on seawater
at 35psu, I poured one liter of freshly made seawater into
a beaker and placed it on a stirplate with a large magnetic
stir bar. I turned the device so that a deep vortex was created
that nearly reached the bottom of the beaker. I then turned
off the stirplate and allowed the beaker to stand for 30 minutes.
I then placed a ceramic airstone powered by a large Rena 400
air pump (Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) into the beaker
and allowed heavy aeration of the water for 45 minutes. The
results are shown in Figure 18.
Figure 18. The effects of stirring, standing
and airstone bubbling on the oxygen levels of one liter
of seawater.
|
Other Tank Oxygen Levels
I measured oxygen levels at single point intervals in a number
of systems including retailers, IMAC display tanks, a coral
farm and Tank 3 one year ago. The levels are shown in Table
2.
Tank
|
Oxygen
(% saturation)
|
Notes
|
Coral
farm, Houston
|
72.9
|
Shallow
tanks with high surface area at midnight (lights off)
|
Coral
farm, Houston
|
112.5
|
Same
tank as above at noon under 400w metal halides
|
Tank
3, July 2004
|
85.4
|
Midnight
reading
|
Tank
3, July 2004
|
117.8
|
4
pm reading
|
Retail
store, coral tank, Houston
|
92.2
|
Salinity
32 psu
|
Vendor
1 display, clam tank, IMAC
|
95.5
|
Newly
setup tank, no lights on
|
Vendor
1 display, “SPS” tank, IMAC
|
111.6
|
Newly
setup tank, skimmer and circulating pumps, no light
|
Vendor
1 display, “corner tank,” IMAC
|
92.9
|
Newly
setup tank, low circulation, bags floating and covering
water’s surface
|
Vendor
2 display, “SPS" tank, IMAC
|
91.2
|
Set
up for three hours with 250w metal halides, circulation
|
Vendor
3 display, new tank, IMAC
|
88.3
|
No
light, no circulation, freshly added water, no livestock
|
Vendor
3 display, 90 gallon tank, IMAC
|
82.4
|
Set
up for two hours, no light, skimmer
|
Vendor
4 display, “SPS” tank, IMAC
|
85.8
|
Newly
setup tank, water circulation only
|
Vendor
4 display, “LPS, soft coral” tank
|
90.4
|
Just
set up with water and circulation only
|
Vendor
5 display, “cube” tank, IMAC
|
89.3
|
Live
rock, angelfish, T5 lights, circulation
|
Vendor
6 display 1
|
92.4
|
Gorgonian
and murky water, no light or circulation
|
Vendor
6 display 2
|
83.8
|
Murky
water just being poured into tank
|
Discussion
Overview
The results of this work show that the oxygen dynamics of
reef tanks, in general, follow patterns similar to those found
on coral reefs (Figure 19).
Figure 19. The oxygen dynamics of a Caribbean
coral reef. The saturation level of oxygen depends on
the temperature, but the red line indicates the average
saturation value of most coral reefs. Note the variance
between days and various parts of the reef. This variance
is also found in reef tanks. Graph adapted from Adey
and Steneck (1985).
|
As on reefs, photosynthesis brings a rapid increase in oxygen
levels within a few hours of "sunrise," whether
the sun or aquarium lighting is used. The similarities between
reefs and tanks are even more pronounced considering that
coral reefs can become hypoxic at night (Borneman 2005a).
The variation between reefs, and between different reef tanks,
is also similar, as the results of my research presented in
this article show.
Many factors can affect the oxygen levels of reef aquaria.
Obviously, salinity and temperature are primary components
of seawater's physical capacity to hold oxygen. The relative
rates of respiration and primary production by plants and
animals vary considerably between tanks. The total biomass
and metabolic rates of organisms greatly affect the oxygen
content of closed volumes of water. The oxygen microenvironment
in various areas of the tank, such as within a coral colony
or between live rocks, was not tested here. It is likely,
however, that there are areas within such spaces with much
less oxygen than is present at the top or middle of the open
water column, similar to what is found on coral reefs. The
flushing and flux of the water column into such spaces is
important in maintaining oxygen levels within them, and this
serves to underscore the importance of water flow within aquaria.
In terms of the factors tested in this article that affect
oxygen levels, I used the presence or absence of protein skimmers,
an algal turf scrubber, powerheads and circulating pumps,
airstones, and light (by photosynthesis) to determine their
effectiveness at elevating or maintaining oxygen levels in
tanks. I also tested their effect on hypoxic and normoxic
water, and tested for the effects of the overlying air by
sealing tanks or containers and by measuring differences between
having an atmospheric versus a pure oxygen environment over
the water.
Tank 1 Discussion
The ten-gallon tank containing clownfish has been set up
as an unskimmed system with what I consider to be an average
stocking density of organisms for a tank of its size. I had
assumed (wrongfully) that oxygen was maintained at high levels
through the use of two powerheads that agitated the water's
surface. However, once the lights went out and photosynthesis
stopped, oxygen levels dropped quickly from a high of 78.7%
of saturation to a hypoxic low of 16% of saturation. The levels
were apparently low enough that each night, the clownfish
would leave their anemone and adopt a position just under
the water's surface directly above a powerhead. Out of concern,
I then monitored the changes in oxygen levels at night using
an airstone. Oxygen rose quickly and dramatically. At that
point, I added a skimmer to the tank, with the result that
oxygen is now maintained at much higher levels, ranging from
a high of 130% of saturation to a low of 81.2% of saturation.
However, it is only when the lights come on that oxygen reaches
saturation or becomes supersaturated. It is notable that there
appears to be a period early in the day when oxygen levels
are maximal, with a depression to slightly subsaturated levels
over the course of the afternoon. Also notable is a slight,
but noticeable, drop in oxygen immediately after feeding.
This measurement has been made repeatedly and is consistent.
Tank 2 Discussion
The 75-gallon tank containing a large porcupine pufferfish
has been maintained using a small skimmer and two powerheads,
and it uses the same amount of lighting as Tank 1, a much
smaller tank. The light levels of this tank are quite subdued,
despite housing many apparently healthy and growing zooxanthellate
species. I did not expect this tank to have oxygen near saturation
values, and I was especially concerned with the oxygen state
of the tank at night. Peak values were 75.4% of saturation,
but surprisingly dropped only to 63.2% of saturation at night.
I sought to raise the nighttime oxygen levels by incorporating
an algal turf scrubber operated on a "reverse daylight"
photoperiod. The effect is noticeable, with oxygen levels
rising quickly once the scrubber lights are turned on. There
was an anomalously low reading of 63% of saturation at 3 AM,
but this may have resulted from a miscalibrated probe or an
accidental bump of the calibration knob in the dark room at
3 AM. I have remeasured the tank at the same time on two other
nights and have not found such a low level; they have been
within the 70-80% of saturation range. It should also be noted
that the recently added algae screen is very poorly developed
and does not yet support a lush turf population. As such,
I expect that the oxygen levels will rise substantially as
these algae develop, and other systems utilizing turf scrubbers
support this expectation (Adey and Loveland 1998).
In contrast to Tank 1, adding an airstone does not affect
the oxygen levels of this tank in so dramatic a manner as
in the smaller tank. While this is expected given the difference
in water volume, even after nine hours there is not a large
increase in oxygen over the values that occur without the
airstone. As with Tank 1, a slight depression in oxygen occurs
after feeding that persists for several hours. Also like Tank
1, the oxygen levels are highest several hours after "sunrise"
with a progressive decline over the afternoon. This tank does
not quite reach saturation and does not become supersaturated
with photosynthesis occurring, although light clearly provides
a marked increase in the water's oxygen content. I attribute
the failure to reach saturating or supersaturating levels
to the relatively low irradiance provided to this tank.
Tank 3 Discussion
The multi-tank system that comprises my 600-gallon reef
system is brightly lit during the day, and three of the five
interconnected tanks are lit on a "reverse daylight"
cycle. The system is skimmed, has strong water flow and a
surge tank, and many overflows that I expected to provide
a high oxygen level in the water throughout the day. Having
measured the tank previously, I knew that oxygen levels were
supersaturated during the day and still relatively high at
night. This occurs despite extensive growths of large corals
and over 20 fish. The readings taken in this tank over the
course of full days show oxygen levels that are very close
to those of the water column over natural reefs. Like the
other tanks, there appears to be a consistent pattern of highest
levels occurring several hours after "sunrise" with
a decline over the afternoon. In this system, it does not
appear that skimming or the Tunze Stream powerheads impact
oxygen levels to any great degree. A depression did occur
after the powerheads were turned off for several hours, but
it was not precipitous.
The cyclical oxygen levels rise and fall primarily in response
to irradiance similar to what occurs on natural coral reefs.
I did not measure oxygen levels at night without the reverse
daylight occurring, and the corresponding expected decline
during nighttime hours; this measurement should be taken to
determine how much oxygen is provided through lighting the
organisms in the sump, refugium and surge tanks at night.
If no significant changes were observed, I would assume the
majority of oxygen enters the tank through the large surface
areas of multiple tanks and numerous overflows, fans blowing
across the water, as well as some base level caused by the
skimmer and powerheads. In this system, the strong water motion
is probably important in pushing oxygenated water throughout
the many microenvironments found in the complex three-dimensional
reef structure.
Tank 4 Discussion
Tank 4 consists of six interconnected tanks, each with a
high surface area/volume ratio. Water flow is provided by
strong pumps. The system also has a powerful protein skimming
system in place, as well as strong lighting. Because the system
is entirely lit at night and is located in a sunroom, a substantial
amount of light enters the room during the day while the systems
are "at night." This irradiance may be partly responsible
for the relatively flat and less cyclical oxygen levels that
occur in this system, although I am unable to control for
this factor without shading many glass walls and ceiling panels.
I suspect, however, that the levels would still be high "at
night" because of the other factors listed above. Oxygen
levels in this system rarely fall to below 90% of saturation,
and are frequently supersaturated, though not to the degree
I expected. As existing coral fragments increase in size,
I will expect to see oxygen levels increase during "day"
and decrease "at night." Because of the importance
of this system, I was unwilling to experiment with manipulations
that might compromise the stability or health of its corals,
and that might have provided some interesting data on the
importance of various factors in oxygenation of the water.
Live Rock Discussion
It is apparent that "live rock" indeed has a significant
metabolic rate that results in nearly hypoxic conditions in
the absence of light or gas exchange at the air/water interface.
The fifteen-gallon tank that held only a single small piece
of live rock and had a low surface area/volume ratio did not
quickly gain oxygen once water flow and exposure to the room's
air occurred. Instead, the oxygen curve increased the most
under illumination. While the increase is not as great as
occurs in Tanks 1-4, it should be noted that there was only
a small piece of rock to produce oxygen by photosynthesis
and irradiance was provided only by a single 18" 15-watt
fluorescent lamp.
In the previous article, this same tank was rapidly oxygenated
using an airstone and powerhead after being made hypoxic with
nitrogen. This reinforces the effect of airstones in small
water volumes that was found in Tank 1. Perhaps most interesting
was the rapid decline in oxygen that occurred when the live
rock was removed. The tank water became cloudy, probably from
a bacterial bloom in the water column, as the water had a
smell of fermentation. The rapid drop in oxygen from bacteria
or other microbial flora has obvious implications for shipping
bags that are frequently cloudy after long transits in dark,
stagnant containers.
Chaetomorpha Discussion
Perhaps most interesting were the results of illuminating
small tanks containing a handful of macroalgae. In the previous
article, the fifteen-gallon tank described above used the
same clump of Chaetomorpha that was described in this
article. In the fifteen-gallon tank made hypoxic through the
use of nitrogen and illuminated by a single 15-watt fluorescent
lamp, little oxygen was provided to the tank by the algae.
In the ten-gallon tank described in this article, the irradiance
was provided by a 65-watt lamp. So long as water flow was
provided, the tank increased its oxygen content only minimally,
and it is hard to say if the same increase would have occurred
without the algae. Once the water flow was turned off, however,
oxygen levels rose quickly. I believe this occurred because
the water flow caused much of the oxygen produced by the algae
to be lost at the air/water interface. With no other organisms
present (besides, obviously, any microbes present), oxygen
levels remained supersaturated in the tank over many hours;
longer, in fact, than I would have expected given gas exchange
at the surface. The reduced effect seen previously in the
fifteen-gallon tank probably resulted from irradiance levels
that were inadequate to maximally stimulate photosynthesis.
This experiment shows algae's potential under sufficient irradiance
and slow flow, such as the conditions found in refugia, to
effectively raise oxygen levels in tank water.
Shipping Bag Discussion
From the limited results shown here, it appears that "breathable"
bags are indeed gas permeable. In this experiment, oxygen
levels decreased, but I did not attempt to determine corresponding
increases in hypoxic water using the same bags. Furthermore,
the motor of the stirplate caused the bag's water to warm
up, and gas bubbles were noticed on the bag's inner surface.
This may explain the decrease in oxygen levels in the breathable
bag over time. In contrast, the gas impermeable plastic bags
neither gained nor lost oxygen. However, when a medium sized
coral was placed into a gas permeable bag, oxygen levels dropped
from a supersaturated state to nearly hypoxic conditions within
seven hours. Porites cylindrica, if anything, is a
species that does not tend to produce copious mucus that would
tend to foul the bag water, and is generally found to be a
"good shipper." In fact, the water in the bag remained
mostly clear despite hourly stirring with the probe inside
the bag. Given the rapid and consistent decline in oxygen,
it would seem that packing corals in a bag full of air may
be a good way to ensure the loss of many species unless the
transfer from location to location is quite short in duration.
The point data taken from numerous shipping bags containing
either corals or snails clearly shows that using oxygen in
shipping bags provides abundant oxygen to the water, and results
in supersaturation of bag water even after extended periods
of time. In fact, some bag water contained such high levels
of oxygen that oxygen toxicity might be a consideration for
some organisms. In contrast, shipping bags sealed only with
atmospheric air began declining immediately and became hypoxic
after lengths of time similar to the pure oxygen containing
bags. This is expected, and follows a similar decline in tanks
at night and/or sealed from water/air interface exchange.
Also of concern are the extremely low oxygen levels in bags
that held "cloudy" water, similar to what was found
in the cloudy water of the live rock tank described above.
I am not sure how such events could be prevented, although
the potential of gas permeable bags to ameliorate the rate
of decline might be possible. In the near future, I will be
receiving corals in gas permeable bags after a long overseas
transit, and I will report any significant findings, if they
occur, in The
Coral Forum.
Stirring and Bubbling Discussion
The effect of stirring and bubbling using an airstone on
normoxic water was rather unremarkable. Only extremely vigorous
stirring increased oxygen levels of freshly made seawater
to near-saturation levels. An airstone and strong air pump
did not have much effect on normoxic water even though only
one liter of water was used. When combined with the results
described above, it appears that airstones under normal use
have a finite capacity to increase oxygen content of seawater
in tanks from 0.27 to 75 gallons in volume to a high but subsaturating
value of perhaps around 90% of saturation over the course
of many hours. Similarly, water movement by stirring on a
stirplate or by using pumps and powerheads in tanks does not
result in oxygen saturation unless the circulation is extreme
or long periods of time are involved.
Point Measurements Discussion
The numerous measurements made in various tanks suggest that
most "average" tanks with circulation, lights and
an "average" composition of organism inhabitants,
or freshly mixed seawater, maintain oxygen levels that are
above hypoxia but are not saturated or supersaturated.
Conclusions and Recommendations
While this work is not comprehensive, it does indicate that
some methods are better than others at maintaining or increasing
oxygen levels. Based on what I have shown in this paper, the
following conclusions and recommendations are made:
-
Reef tanks approximate the cyclical nature of oxygen
dynamics found in the field.
-
Variation on daily and seasonal cycles is the rule rather
than the exception on natural coral reefs, and appears
to be the rule in reef aquaria, as well.
-
Aquaria can and do become hypoxic at night and such a
state may pose a risk to hypoxia-intolerant organisms.
Cloudy water in shipping containers and tanks is a cause
for concern as oxygen levels are measured to decline rapidly
and to very low levels.
-
Gas impermeable bags packed with an oxygen cap result
in high water oxygen levels even over long periods of
time. The levels are, in some cases, extremely high and
may be a cause for concern in hyperoxia-sensitive species.
Gas permeable bags are not permeable enough to ensure
adequate oxygen levels in bags containing living specimens
over normal overnight shipping durations.
-
Aquaria can and do become saturated or supersaturated
with oxygen during the day, and this is a result of oxygen
resulting from irradiance of photosynthetic organisms.
In no case was saturation or supersaturation measured
without photosynthesis.
-
Airstones and skimmers appear to be a very effective
means of oxygenating small water volumes. Their effect
on larger water volumes appears to be less. While the
effect may be relative, the larger tanks and systems described
here utilized powerful skimming or air pumps, and to gain
an equivalent amount of oxygen as occurs in small water
volumes would likely require air pumps or skimmers far
larger than those commonly employed by aquarists. This
includes data from a coral farm where very large commercial
sized skimmers and high surface area/volume ratios failed
to produce water even nearly saturated with oxygen at
night with a heavy coral population.
-
Powerheads and recirculating pumps do not appear to greatly
increase the oxygen saturation state of seawater aquaria.
Instead, they probably serve to move oxygenated waters
to areas of the tank that are locally lower in oxygen
resulting from respiration within the tank.
-
Using algae in reverse daylight tanks appears to be an
effective means of keeping oxygen levels at normoxic levels
at night. This effect is pronounced even in tanks and
systems that employ protein skimmers and airstones.
|